Classics Saloons Forum

Welcome! Sign In Register
Please Sign In or Register to Search

Triple HD8s on Mark 2

Posted by Whitworth Ranch 
AutoShrine Sponsor
AutoShrine Sponsor
AutoShrine Sponsor

Whitworth Ranch Avatar
Mark H.
California, South, USA   usa
Has anyone here put a set of E-type triple SUs on a Mark 2? Appears that a sheetmetal modification at the front is necessary. Would there be a benefit to going to the straight-port head?

My intake setup is all stock and very sweet running, but whenever I drive my E-type, I think the power would be great fun in a Mark 2.

Mark



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/20/2010 08:10PM by Whitworth Ranch.

. You can hide this ad & support this site by upgrading to a Gold Membership ~ click here for more info.
FÃ¥revejle, Denmark   dnk
You need a straight port top. The pattern of inlet holes is much different. The right top would be such as E-type, 340, 420, MK X 4.2.
You can use a top from a XJ, but be avare of the 2 waterholes in back end of the XJ cyl.head. They must be blocked.
If you can get one from a XJ6 series 3, many of them have bigger inlet valves.
rgds
Knud
Dave C
somewhere, USA   usa
1950 Ford Custom
1950 Ford F-1 "The Ugly Truckling"
1964 Jaguar Mark 2 "Elizabeth"
I've looked at that on my MK2 and the granddad's Mk1.....I don't know how in the world the back carb would clear the battery. On mine, it's also the brake and clutch masters, and the reservoir about where #1 air cleaner would fit.

. You can hide this ad & support this site by upgrading to a Gold Membership ~ click here for more info.
Natal, South Africa   zaf
1964 Jaguar Mark 2 "THE OLD GIRL"
I DO NOT THINK THIS MOD IS WORTH ALL THE TROUBLE. A LHD car is easier to do as there is no clutch master cylinder to get in the way. Even so, the engine bay becomes terribly crowded and things like the distributor become almost impossible to get at. Air filtration is also a major problem and the skinny things people fit reduce the power more than the gain of the 3 carbs. Remember the E had long ram tubes going into the carbs which hugely boosted bottom end torque. The wiper motor, brake fluid bottle and fuel filter will have to be moved to different locations and it is worthwhile putting the battery in the boot.
The E got its performance from a lighter all up weight, lower drag, free flow exhaust, straight port head, electric cooling fan(s) and the air filtration system already mentioned. (And of course the triple inlet manifold and carbs!)
To stay sane the best set up if you want to modify a Mk2 is a Series 3 XJ head and cams, series 1 XJ inlet manifold, free flow 45mm exhausts with standard exhaust manifolds and a pair of SU HIF7 carbs from a late S2 XJ 4.2. These carbs are much more compact than HD8s and flow just about the same amount of air. Being shorter in length allows high flow K+Ns to be fitted without cutting the inner fender. I do not recommend porting the head or inlet manifold, but just smooth out any roughness, put a proper 3 angle cut on the seats and a 2 angle cut on the valves. The seats must not be pocketed!

Comparitive air flows:

HD6: 181 CFM at 1.5" Hg

HIF7: 233

HD8: 269
GT6Steve Avatar
Steve Smith
North Las Vegas, USA   usa
Heresy follows, start going LaLaLa right now if easily offended.

Years ago an Aussie came to the Jag forums. He was extremely knowledgable and extremely opinionated. I often thought he was right.

One of his most provocative claims was that the three SU's were pure marketing and were simply too much carburetor for the E's. He backed his argument up with calcs but was lambasted as a heretic. I still have a lot of his posts on an old hard drive. That said, is there a need for three HD8's on your car??

Steve

. You can hide this ad & support this site by upgrading to a Gold Membership ~ click here for more info.
Whitworth Ranch Avatar
Mark H.
California, South, USA   usa
I thought it would be cool to have three. There certainly are large implications and the points about E-types needing that intake length are quite true. It would for sure run better than the twin HD6s on there now. But I do have a twin HD8 setup that would be relatively easy to install. Also, a friend of mine has done a of performance building and tuning at his shop--land speed Astons and Jags, racing engines--and he said he got something beyond 300 horsepower on a dyno using twin HD8s.
Dave C
somewhere, USA   usa
1950 Ford Custom
1950 Ford F-1 "The Ugly Truckling"
1964 Jaguar Mark 2 "Elizabeth"
You ought to try getting power out of a MK2 with twin downdraught Solexes.

Whitworth Ranch Avatar
Mark H.
California, South, USA   usa
Things of beauty, they are...
Dave C
somewhere, USA   usa
1950 Ford Custom
1950 Ford F-1 "The Ugly Truckling"
1964 Jaguar Mark 2 "Elizabeth"
You mean Solexes?

Add your reply here, or post your own questions!

Members Sign In if you've already registered, or
Register a New Account
Registration is free and takes less than a minute

Having trouble posting or changing forum settings?
Check the Forum Help File (FAQ) or contact the webmaster.
View the archived version of this thread.
Built using Phorum Open Source Software


Join Our Club

Sign In to post questions or share your photos!

JagExp Menu

Welcome

Forums ->

The Pub

Buy, Sell & Trade

Vendor & Group Buy

The E-Type

The XJ & XJ40

The XJ-S

Classic XK

Classics Saloons

Modern Luxury

Modern GT

Modern Executive

Supercars

Motorsport

Replicas

Forum Search

Latest Posts

Journals

Calendar

Membership

Tech Library

Car Registry

Cars For Sale

Model Info

Directory

Member Map

JagExp Store

Search

Advertising Info

Smartphone quick link
jagexp.mobi

Adjust Text Size

Larger Smaller
Reset Save